But for him, Sampras was and always will remain the best. “He was a class apart. Federer and Nadal are good, but not in his league,” Moya says. DNAindia.com
I’ll just assume that something was lost in translation here - maybe he was arguing about Sampras being great in many ways outside of just play and titles? Even Sampras hints around that Federer now is a better player than he was. I don’t disagree about Nadal, as Nadal is young and has a way to go before he has as much success as Feds or Pete - I’ll admit that I am on the Nadal bandwagon and want to see him do really well in the future.
I’d absolutely love to see Sampras and Moya sit down and argue on who the best player is/was - Pete can argue for Feds, and Moya can argue for Pete.